why is a 1 start problem "horrible"?

Post here what do you think about ideachess and your improvement suggestions.

why is a 1 start problem "horrible"?

Postby BearJr » Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:04 am

I`d strongly suggest that the names "horrible" and "poor" should be changed to something more in accordance to the strenght of the problem. For example: 1 star: very easy. 2 stars: easy. 3 stars: dificult. 4 stars: very dificult. 5 stars: highest level.
BearJr
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:02 pm

why is a 1 start problem "horrible"?

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: why is a 1 start problem "horrible"?

Postby Remiem » Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:32 pm

The problem difficulty rating is done automatically(something along the lines:It's given an ELO rating as if the problem were a human player. If you solve the problem, the problem lost. If you failed the problem, the problem won.) The problem ELO is displayed after solving a problem in Tactics ELO (below Average Time). The "Average rating" of the stars is about the quality of the problem.
I would say
1 star means the problem is bugged/very annoying.
2 stars You don't like it.
3 stars OK
4 stars is a nice problem.
5 stars is a very nice problem.
Remiem
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:28 pm

Re: why is a 1 start problem "horrible"?

Postby Zuril » Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:36 pm

I've changed the description of the star quality rating accordling to Remiem's suggestion.
Zuril
Site Admin
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:16 am
Location: Italy


Return to Site Feedback

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Fatal: Not able to open ./cache/data_global.php